🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.